<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passing through fire and frost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/</link>
	<description>Scottish soundscaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vl</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>vl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I got a friend to buy me a Jupiter-8 for it in Moscow, as I&#039;m not a huge fan of those turret things for wide lenses. I&#039;m curious about the rather large quantity of blades in that lens...

In any case, I&#039;m starting to realize that all Soviet cameras tend to scratch film in one way or another. I&#039;m not sure if older film was thicker and sturdier (people tell me this is the case) or that I just keep getting bad ones, they&#039;re all a little different too.

How are pictures coming out with this?

-vl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a friend to buy me a Jupiter-8 for it in Moscow, as I&#8217;m not a huge fan of those turret things for wide lenses. I&#8217;m curious about the rather large quantity of blades in that lens&#8230;</p>
<p>In any case, I&#8217;m starting to realize that all Soviet cameras tend to scratch film in one way or another. I&#8217;m not sure if older film was thicker and sturdier (people tell me this is the case) or that I just keep getting bad ones, they&#8217;re all a little different too.</p>
<p>How are pictures coming out with this?</p>
<p>-vl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lavelle</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lavelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Ha ha!  That kind of shoe!

Well, mine has the usual, slightly battered FED-2 (n)ever-ready case.

I like the collapsible lens too; you&#039;re right it makes the whole camera so much more compact!  I have a spare Jupiter-12 lens, if you&#039;re interested.  You might need a bigger shoe, though...  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha!  That kind of shoe!</p>
<p>Well, mine has the usual, slightly battered FED-2 (n)ever-ready case.</p>
<p>I like the collapsible lens too; you&#8217;re right it makes the whole camera so much more compact!  I have a spare Jupiter-12 lens, if you&#8217;re interested.  You might need a bigger shoe, though&#8230;  <img src='http://www.brianlavelle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vl</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>vl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-175</guid>
		<description>By shoe I meant a leather thing to put it in :p

Mine is rather cute in it&#039;s leather &quot;shoe&quot;, it has a little plastic thing to put notes on (I&#039;ll post a pic sometime) with some old scribbles from hell knows when. I was thinking of getting a Jupiter lens for it, but then, that really defeats the purpose of it being foldable and nicely protected by the shoe...

-vl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By shoe I meant a leather thing to put it in :p</p>
<p>Mine is rather cute in it&#8217;s leather &#8220;shoe&#8221;, it has a little plastic thing to put notes on (I&#8217;ll post a pic sometime) with some old scribbles from hell knows when. I was thinking of getting a Jupiter lens for it, but then, that really defeats the purpose of it being foldable and nicely protected by the shoe&#8230;</p>
<p>-vl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lavelle</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lavelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-174</guid>
		<description>vl,

It is in very nice condition.  I was delighted with it; quite amazing really for a 50 year old camera.  And it does have an accessory shoe - you can just about see it on the top of the camera at the back, hiding on the lower part of that top edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vl,</p>
<p>It is in very nice condition.  I was delighted with it; quite amazing really for a 50 year old camera.  And it does have an accessory shoe &#8211; you can just about see it on the top of the camera at the back, hiding on the lower part of that top edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vl</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>vl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-173</guid>
		<description>That looks like a very clean and pretty camera. Does it have a shoe?

-vl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks like a very clean and pretty camera. Does it have a shoe?</p>
<p>-vl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Lavelle</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lavelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Well, Ryan, who knows if the photographs will be better!  What I like about using film is the mystery of not quite ever knowing if a photograph will be wonderful or just dull (or worse still, out of focus or underexposed, et cetera).

But I think you&#039;re right: new does not always mean better.  And there&#039;s something magical about the feel of one of these old cameras: heavy in the hands, tried and tested, and capable of producing truly beautiful results.  That&#039;s always assuming the photographer is capable of that, too, I suppose. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ryan, who knows if the photographs will be better!  What I like about using film is the mystery of not quite ever knowing if a photograph will be wonderful or just dull (or worse still, out of focus or underexposed, et cetera).</p>
<p>But I think you&#8217;re right: new does not always mean better.  And there&#8217;s something magical about the feel of one of these old cameras: heavy in the hands, tried and tested, and capable of producing truly beautiful results.  That&#8217;s always assuming the photographer is capable of that, too, I suppose. <img src='http://www.brianlavelle.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamboo Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlavelle.org/index.php/2008/06/09/passing-through-fire-and-frost/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamboo Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teajournal.wordpress.com/?p=36#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Purchase an old camera with older technology for superior black and white photos? I guess then, what&#039;s new isn&#039;t always better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Purchase an old camera with older technology for superior black and white photos? I guess then, what&#8217;s new isn&#8217;t always better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

